Many churches treat the care of the missionary as something secondary — a kind of extra that can be offered once fundraising, sending, and promotion are done and time, energy, or resources still remain. Scripture, however, does not present care this way. It treats care as a stewardship responsibility before God. The missionary does not belong to the church that sent him; his life was entrusted by God to that church's care. And the steward who neglects what was given him to manage is not commended simply for having fulfilled the most visible part of his task. He, too, will have to give an account.
Scripture makes this responsibility clear. God has never demanded faithfulness without also providing sustenance. Moses led the people through the wilderness, but he was not alone. When his arms grew weary during intercession, Aaron and Hur held them up, one on each side, until sunset (Exod 17:12). After confronting the prophets of Baal, Elijah reached such a depth of exhaustion that he asked God to take his life under a broom tree. The Lord's response was not rebuke but the care of an angel who brought him bread and water and let him rest. This happened twice before any new word or new mission came to him (1 Kgs 19:4-8). Jesus sent the disciples out two by two, never in isolation, and he was also sustained by women who supported him out of their own means (Luke 8:1-3). If God himself never separated calling from provision, no church should separate sending from care.
Two common distortions pull the church away from this responsibility. The first is pragmatism, which turns the missionary into an instrument of results — reports, conversion numbers, presence on a given field, or other performance indicators. He stops being seen as a person and starts being evaluated by what he produces. As long as he delivers results, he is valued. But once he burns out, he can be replaced or simply forgotten, with no one asking what it cost him to keep serving.
The second distortion is the spiritualizing of exhaustion. Fatigue, loneliness, and crisis are automatically read as signs of immaturity or lack of faith, as though those who serve God could not experience suffering and weakness. Both distortions share the same root: forgetting that the missionary remains a jar of clay. He carries a treasure that is not his own, but his fragility remains real (2 Cor 4:7).
When care is understood as stewardship, its structure changes as well. The lesson that introduces this unit presents five spheres that sustain the missionary, and none of them is sufficient on its own. The first is the Lord himself, the ultimate source of sustenance and perseverance. Recognizing this, however, does not eliminate the other spheres, because God ordinarily sustains his servants through people, not apart from them. The second involves self-care and mutual care among missionaries themselves. No one serves well in isolation, and a missionary with no other missionaries nearby loses the reference points that could help him recognize warning signs he might not notice alone. The third sphere belongs to the sending church, which must offer ongoing pastoral follow-up, not merely financial support. The fourth is specialized care, needed when a given situation calls for professional competencies that pastoral follow-up alone does not possess. The fifth is networked care, which connects the previous four so that none of them functions in isolation.
Nor can this stewardship be reduced to a one-time action. It is an ongoing process that accompanies the missionary through four distinct phases: preparation, the field, transitions, and return. Preparation is decisive for preventing future difficulties, because habits, relationships, and bonds established before departure can sustain what comes afterward. On the field, care must be constant, since pressures rarely arise all at once. They accumulate gradually, often without being noticed. Transitions are at once one of the most vulnerable and most neglected phases, requiring a closeness and flexibility they seldom receive. Return, in turn, can be more delicate than the departure itself. Rather than a hurried celebration followed by silence, it often calls for welcome, listening, and time.
If your church has sent out a missionary, this stewardship has already begun and continues today. It is not limited to the day of sending. So it is worth an honest review: how long has it been since someone in leadership asked that missionary how he is doing, without centering the conversation only on what he has done? Is there a designated person responsible for his care, or does everything depend on whoever happens to remember first?
A simple, concrete step can be taken this very week: choose, by name, one missionary your church supports, and send a message asking only how he is doing. Do not ask for a report. Do not press for results. Just ask how he is.
That is exactly where stewardship begins — not necessarily in elaborate structures, but in someone who remembers, by name, the one who was sent.
Want to know more about the work of Projeto Didasko in Portugal?